Please comment in the box provided below, especially if you would like to suggest additional rules to protect our rights. Bearing in mind that we oppose all forms of regulation since it infringes our freedom to say and do whatever we like. (Our rules aren't regulations, they are necessary mandatory strictly enforced value statements that aim to keep out riff raff like bleeding heart liberals, feminazis and the PC brigade who want to limit our freedom of speech. We've found it's one way to silence them. Banning by IP address works sometimes too.)
HotWhopper complies, except where we disagree on the grounds that all government regulation is bad and we have the right to decide when 'free speech' applies (ie when we agree) and when it doesn't (ie when we don't agree), with ASIC Regulatory Guideline 162 for Internet Discussion Sites. Please visit www.asic.gov.au for further information on this guideline. The HotWhopper website is operated by Report Card Fail Pty Ltd (ACN 000 000 000).
You understand that all information, data, text, photographs, graphics, or other materials ("Content"), whether publicly posted or privately transmitted, are the sole responsibility of the person from which such Content originated. This means that you, and not HotWhopper, are entirely responsible for all Content that you upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available via the Service. (That's our out-clause we try on. We're looking at ways to get out from under the draconian laws in Australia and maybe move to the USA where Ron Paul lives.) HotWhopper does not control the Content posted via the Service and, as such, does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of such Content. (You betcha!) You understand that by using the Service, you may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable and if you are a normal man or woman, that's pretty well guaranteed. Under no circumstances will HotWhopper be liable in any way for any Content, including, but not limited to, for any errors or omissions in any Content, or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any Content posted, emailed, transmitted or otherwise made available via the Service. (That's another out-clause we try on.)
You agree to not use the Service to:
You acknowledge that HotWhopper may or may not pre-screen Content, but that HotWhopper and its designees shall have the right (but not the obligation) in their sole discretion to pre-screen, refuse, or move any Content that is available via the Service. If you don't like what someone says, just send us a TOU (see 26. Violations below). Without limiting the foregoing, HotWhopper and its designees shall have the right to remove any Content that violates the TOU or is otherwise objectionable. In particular, if you give the slightest indication that you might be a bleeding heart liberal, a woman, accept climate science, don't support Ron Paul, suspect paranoid conspiracy theories might not actually be based on evidence or believe that all people (even people of different ethnic origins, religious beliefs, political leanings even slightly to the left of Tony Abbott, sexual orientation and women) should be treated equally then your posts on any topic may be deleted and you may be suspended for a period not less than 30 days. If you persist in being so outrageously outspoken, you will be permanently suspended and banned from posting forever. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of any Content, including any reliance on the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of such Content. Exceptions include: science, particularly climate science; any and all evidence-based medicine, particularly vaccinations; conspiracies such as UN Agenda21, 911, any conspiracy that we know involves Jewish people, chemtrails, HAARP, the Pope, Prince Philip, the Queen, Al Gore, Barack Hussein Obama, Juliar Gillard or others as we, the moderators and management of HotWhopper determine to be acceptable. In this regard, you acknowledge that you may not rely on any Content created by HotWhopper or submitted to HotWhopper, including without limitation information in HotWhopper Message Boards, and in all other parts of the Service.
You acknowledge, consent and agree that HotWhopper may access, preserve, and disclose your account information and Content if required to do so by law or in a good faith belief that such access preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to: (a) comply with legal process; (b) enforce the TOU; (c) respond to claims that any Content violates the rights of third-parties; (d) respond to your requests for customer service; or (e) protect the rights, property, or personal safety of HotWhopper, its users and the public.
You understand that the technical processing and transmission of the Service, including your Content, may involve (a) transmissions over various networks; and (b) changes to conform and adapt to technical requirements of connecting networks or devices.
You understand that the Service and software embodied within the Service may include security components that permit digital materials to be protected, and use of these materials is subject to usage rules set by HotWhopper and/or content providers who provide content to the Service. You may not attempt to override or circumvent any of the usage rules embedded into the Service. Any unauthorized reproduction, publication, further distribution or public exhibition of the materials provided on the Service, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Please report any violations of the TOU to HotWhopper Support via the support feature available on the HotWhopper website, particularly if you suspect the poster is an unwelcome subscriber such as a bleeding heart liberal or feminazi.
If you do report any violation be aware that if we regard you, at our own discretion, to be a bleeding heart liberal, a woman, accepting of evidence-based science particularly climate science, don't support Ron Paul, suspect paranoid conspiracy theories might not actually be based on evidence or believe that all people (even people of different ethnic origins, religious beliefs, political leanings even slightly to the left of Tony Abbott, sexual orientation and women) should be treated equally then we may, at our discretion:
We will make an exception if you prove to us that you:
If you are of the correct political persuasion, particularly if are a man or otherwise have shown that you embrace the ideology of HotWhopper management and moderation team, we urge you to report any post, regardless of whether it violates a TOU or not and we assure you that we will act promptly to delete the post that you wish to have removed and, if you request it, to suspend the poster for a period of at least four (4) days or permanently.
This is in a thread in which real men discuss the appalling treatment dished out by Indigenous loafers thinking they have the right to freedom of expression (as if!). One moderator mistakenly removed the post and even went so far as giving a short suspension, but when we moderators came together as a group, we were easily able to convince the misguided mod that it was a perfectly acceptable form of 'free speech':
At least two bleeding heart liberals wanted us to delete this post, but we recognised them immediately and ignored them:
PS Because we 'just know' that some readers have limited cognitive ability, we explicitly state that this page is satire. However, the examples of posts are the real thing.
Many climate science deniers are very selective in how they apply their warped notions of free speech. The main cases that comes to mind are the defamation lawsuits taken out by Michael Mann and Andrew Weaver. You can read a bit about them:
A lot of the more vocal deniers seem to believe that defamation is fine - unless of course it's they who are the subject of ridicule. You may recall how anti-science blogger, Anthony Watts, threatened to sue Greg Laden. This is the same Anthony Watts who publishes articles and comments on his blog, that falsely allege individual (and collective) scientists have committed fraud or similar. All Greg Laden did was mock Anthony for not realising that a photo was of common earth diatoms - not life from "outer space" or from nearby asteroids.
I've done some analysis of denier tactics and how they build on defamatatory articles: