Welcome to HotWhopper Chat
Before you post, read the introduction to HotWhopper Chat in the Wiki.
Welcome to HotWhopper Chat!
Whether you're new to climate topics or an expert you are most welcome. Before you can comment you'll need to register or sign in. Click one of the buttons below.
Forums
In this Discussion
Where Australia's electricity comes from
This widget is updated every couple of minutes and shows why Australia is such a huge GHG emitter.
Barmy bloopers from John Christy and co at WUWT seven years later
From the HotWhopper article:
... I was only mildly surprised to find that John Christy has co-authored an article for some disinformation purpose. His co-authors are, wait for it, Joe D'Aleo (would you believe) and James P Wallace III. Joe is in cahoots with Anthony Watts on his dormant or defunct Open Atmospheric Society. This trio wrote an article protesting the EPA's seven year old Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act. Yep. Seven years it's been out, and it's taken this mob all that time to come up with an angle they think might fly. Or might fly with the scientific illiterati at any rate.
...What they claim is:
... I was only mildly surprised to find that John Christy has co-authored an article for some disinformation purpose. His co-authors are, wait for it, Joe D'Aleo (would you believe) and James P Wallace III. Joe is in cahoots with Anthony Watts on his dormant or defunct Open Atmospheric Society. This trio wrote an article protesting the EPA's seven year old Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act. Yep. Seven years it's been out, and it's taken this mob all that time to come up with an angle they think might fly. Or might fly with the scientific illiterati at any rate.
...What they claim is:
- it's not really warmed, or not significantly.
- it's the sun (based on cumulative TSI - what the heck did they do there?)
- it's El Nino (based on cumulative MEI - what the heck did they do there?).
I mean, seriously?
Tagged:
Tagged:
Comments
Their early MSU interpretation howlers are now covered in undergraduate textbooks that discuss how early satellite data conflicted with the surface data re the direction of the temperature trend.
In my opinion their mistakes have erred far too often on the side that they openly endorse.
Isn't that something that can be quantified and presented?
Where's some feisty attorney general when we need him/her?