<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
      <title>Climate Solutions &amp;amp; Technology — HotWhopper Chat</title>
      <link>http://www.hotwhopper.com/chat/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 12:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
          <description>Climate Solutions &amp; Technology — HotWhopper Chat</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="http://www.hotwhopper.com/chat/categories/climate-solutions-technology/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Top coal executive admits CCS is a waste of time.</title>
        <link>http://www.hotwhopper.com/chat/discussion/222/top-coal-executive-admits-ccs-is-a-waste-of-time</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 21:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Climate Solutions &amp; Technology</category>
        <dc:creator>Contrail Chook</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">222@/chat/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<b>IEEFA Update: Elections Have Consequences, but Perhaps Few That Can Save Coal</b><br /><br /><blockquote><p>We didn’t make it this year to the Coaltrans USA 
conference last week in Miami, but we heard tell of some smart talk at 
the event by two of the industry’s CEOs, Bob Murray of Murray Energy and
 Kevin Crutchfield of Contura Energy, né Alpha Natural Resources...&nbsp; &nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>ONE POINT OF CONTENTION ACROSS THE INDUSTRY
 revolves around the viability of carbon capture and sequestration, the 
largely experimental notion that “clean coal” will save the day.</p>
<p>Crutchfield said no utility executive in his or her right mind would 
build a coal plant in the U.S. today, but argued for an era of 
innovation to pave the way for CCS. <b>Murray says CCS is a waste of time, 
fully aware that the industry has a weak track record on innovation and 
probably lacks the DNA to change.</b></p>
<p>Both men were around during the second 
Bush administration when it canceled federal funding for a major CCS 
project because it was simply too expensive. And both know that the same
 administration canceled a 70-year-old federally subsidized coal plant 
program through the Department of Agriculture. They know, too, that <a href="http://ieefa.org/ieefa-wyoming-bid-export-clean-coal-japan-rings-false" rel="nofollow">the industry itself has spent precious few dollars on CCS</a>, leaving the risks to ratepayers and shareholders of large utilities like Duke Energy and Southern Company. </p></blockquote><p><br /></p><br /><br />]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Engie to shut Victoria's dirtiest coal plant - Hazelwood</title>
        <link>http://www.hotwhopper.com/chat/discussion/123/engie-to-shut-victorias-dirtiest-coal-plant-hazelwood</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Climate Solutions &amp; Technology</category>
        <dc:creator>Sou</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">123@/chat/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[From <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/hazelwood-shutdown-victorias-dirtiest-power-station-set-to-close-early-next-year-20160923-grn0ph.html" title="Link: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/hazelwood-shutdown-victorias-dirtiest-power-station-set-to-close-early-next-year-20160923-grn0ph.html">The Age newspaper</a>:<br /><blockquote>Victoria's dirtiest power station will&nbsp;shut down permanently as early as next April, in a blow to the Latrobe Valley that could&nbsp;cost up to&nbsp;1000 jobs.<br />The owner of the Hazelwood plant, French energy giant Engie, is expected to hold a board meeting on October 19 or 20 to finalise a decision to close the&nbsp;aging brown coal-fired plant.</blockquote><p>This should have happened years ago. It's the dirtiest coal plant in Victoria, and probably in Australia.&nbsp;</p><p>I wasn't sure where to post this. It's not new tech, it's closing old tech. Nor is it government policy. The owners have made the choice to shut it down.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>UK national grid status</title>
        <link>http://www.hotwhopper.com/chat/discussion/99/uk-national-grid-status</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 01:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Climate Solutions &amp; Technology</category>
        <dc:creator>thefordprefect</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">99@/chat/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gridwatch.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://gridwatch.co.uk/</a></p><p>Start here but there are widgets that give near real time pictorial</p><p>or alternative (no widgets)</p><p><a href="http://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/</a></p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Cost of Wind</title>
        <link>http://www.hotwhopper.com/chat/discussion/32/cost-of-wind</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 15:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Climate Solutions &amp; Technology</category>
        <dc:creator>thefordprefect</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">32@/chat/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I have looked for costing for wind generated electricity. The only info I found was for Balloo woods:</p><p>A cost&nbsp; varies considerably from the number of operational years 12 years warranted figure used is guestimate</p><p>This is an oldish small turbine.</p><p>Are more modern windfarms more financially efficient?</p><p>Any figures out there??&nbsp;</p><p><img title="Image: http://www.hotwhopper.com/chat/uploads/editor/ca/pyzyz391rrvm.jpg" alt="" src="http://www.hotwhopper.com/chat/uploads/editor/ca/pyzyz391rrvm.jpg" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Balancing costs and short term reserves are from uk parliament</p><p>conventional backup &nbsp;national grid</p><p>others from <a href="https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/balloo_wood_wind_turbine" rel="nofollow">https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/balloo_wood_wind_turbine</a></p><p><br /></p><p></p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Costa Rica</title>
        <link>http://www.hotwhopper.com/chat/discussion/83/costa-rica</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 19:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Climate Solutions &amp; Technology</category>
        <dc:creator>tadaaa</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">83@/chat/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Costa Rica has been in the news, I heard a piece on BBC radio the other night regarding Costa Rica and renewables ( it was a bit of a "puff piece" tbh)</p><p>Two interesting takes on it </p><p><a href="http://www.vox.com/2016/9/8/12847160/costa-rica-renewable-electricity" rel="nofollow">http://www.vox.com/2016/9/8/12847160/costa-rica-renewable-electricity</a></p><p>And an uncharacteristically circumspect one from the guardian from a year ago &nbsp;</p><p>It always fascinating reading articles that start with a headline that begins "the truth"</p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/30/truth-behind-costa-rica-renewable-energy-reservoirs-climate-change" rel="nofollow">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/30/truth-behind-costa-rica-renewable-energy-reservoirs-climate-change</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   <language>en</language>
   </channel>
</rss>
